Tayib vs Yuka
Factual comparison, no bashing. Yuka and Tayib look alike at first: scan a barcode, get a score. But they answer different questions. Yuka rates a product's health impact. Tayib first answers 'is it halal, and why?', then adds a composition score. Here is what each one does, according to its own public pages.
TayibFree · iPhone · 4 schools
A popular health scanner
Everything, row by row
| Feature |  Tayib | |
|---|---|---|
| Main question | Halal, doubtful or haram — and why | The product's health impact |
| Halal status | Verdict explained ingredient by ingredient, for your school | Not mentioned in its published scoring method |
| Religious sources | Verses, graded hadith, institutional rulings | Outside its scope |
| Composition score | Tayib score /100: nutrition 40, processing & additives 30, alcohol & stimulants 15, sugar-salt-fat 15 | Score /100: nutritional quality (Nutri-Score) 60%, additives 30%, organic 10% |
| Score caps | 0 if haram, 49 at most when halal status needs checking | 49 at most when a high-risk additive is present |
| Independence | No brand pays for its score, no ads | States that no brand can influence its scores |
| Paid version | Tayib+: search without scanning, family allergies, recall watch, offline (€10, €15 or €20/yr) | Paid version with offline mode, advanced search and food preferences |
Sources · checked October 11, 2026
Ideal user profile
Pick Tayib if
You want to know whether a product is halal for your school, understand why an ingredient raises a question, and see the texts behind the rule.
Go with Yuka if
Your question is health first: nutrition, additives, organic — including cosmetics, which Yuka also analyses.
Which one for you?
They are not direct rivals. Yuka is a health tool; it does not tell you whether a product is halal. Tayib answers that question first, with its sources, then gives a composition score. Nothing stops you from keeping both.
Download on theApp StoreFree · iPhone · Unlimited scanning